After Arminius

Inspired by the ideas of the Dutch theologian Jacob Arminius, Arminianism was the subject of important theological controversies in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and still today remains an important position within Protestant thought.

What became known as Arminian theology was held by people across a wide swath of geographical and ecclesial positions. This theological movement was in part a reaction to the Reformed doctrine of predestination and was founded on the assertion that God's sovereignty and human free will are compatible. More broadly, it was an attempt to articulate a holistic view of God and salvation that is grounded in Scripture and Christian tradition as well as adequate to the challenges of life.

First developed in European, British, and American contexts, the movement engaged with a wide range of intellectual challenges. While standing together in their common rejection of several key planks of Reformed theology, supporters of Arminianism took varying positions on other matters. Some were broadly committed to catholic and creedal theology, while others were more open to theological revision. Some were concerned primarily with practical matters, while others were engaged in system-building as they sought to articulate and defend an over-arching vision of God and the world.

The story of Arminian development is complex, yet essential for a proper understanding of the history of Protestant theology. The historical development of Arminian theology, however, is not well known. In After Arminius, Thomas H. McCall and Keith D. Stanglin offer a thorough historical introduction to Arminian theology, providing an account that will be useful to scholars and students of ecclesiastical history and modern Christian thought.

""Arminianism" was the subject of important theological controversies in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and it remains an important position within Protestant thought. What became known as "Arminian" theology was held by people across a swath of geographical and ecclesial positions; it developed in European, British, and American contexts, and it engaged with a wide range of intellectual challenges. While standing together in their common rejection of several key planks of Reformed theology, proponents of Arminianism took various positions on other matters. Some were broadly committed to catholic and creedal theology; others were more open to theological revision. Some were concerned primarily with practical concerns; others were engaged in system-building as they sought to articulate and defend an over-arching vision of God and the world. The story of this development is both complex and important for a proper understanding of the history of Protestant theology. However, this historical development of Arminian theology is not well known. In this book, Thomas H. McCall and Keith D. Stanglin offer a historical introduction to Arminian theology as it developed in modern thought, providing an account that is based upon important primary sources and recent secondary research that will be helpful to scholars of ecclesial history and modern thought as well as comprehensible and relevant for students"--

Drs. Stanglin and McCall deserve highest commendations for this comprehensive and judicious overview. Addressing the compendium of this theological tradition requires superlative historical research that spans 400 years, as well as theological and philosophical insight into the vagaries and complexities of theological change. To be sure, secondary source citations are to be found here, but what strikes the reader is the degree to which these authors are acquainted with the original Latin and Dutch sources - giving nuance seldom found in such surveys. Stanglin and McCall have removed the excuse for scholars to resort to previously common theological caricatures of Arminius and his successors in all their theological expressions. -- W. Stephen Gunter, Ph.D., author of Arminius and His 'Declaration of Sentiments': An Annotated Translation with Introduction and Theological Commentary

Stanglin and McCall have produced a worthy sequel to their Jacob Arminius: Theologian of Grace. In this important work they trace out the patterns of Arminian theology in the continental Remonstrant followers of Arminius and in British and North American Methodist Arminianism, depicting in a careful and compelling manner the rich history of Arminianism. The presentation of trajectories of Arminian thought in America from the eighteenth through the nineteenth century is of particular importance for the retrieval and reception of what has been a largely and unjustly neglected tradition in American theology. This is a fine work that sets a high standard for future writing in this field. -- Richard A. Muller, P. J. Zondervan Professor of Historical Theology, Emeritus, Calvin Theological Seminary