Five Weeks

"Five Weeks" is a penetrating historical analysis that examines the critical period between the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and the outbreak of the First World War. Written by historian Jonathan French Scott, this work delves into the surge of public opinion and the diplomatic maneuvers that swept Europe during the summer of 1914. Unlike many military histories that focus primarily on the battlefield, Scott meticulously tracks the shifting sentiments within the press and the populace of the major European powers, including Germany, Austria-Hungary, France, and Great Britain.

The narrative explores how nationalistic fervor and political pressures influenced governmental decisions, ultimately leading to a global conflict. By analyzing contemporary newspapers and official documents, the author provides a vivid account of how the July Crisis transformed from a localized Balkan dispute into a world-shattering war. "Five Weeks" remains a significant scholarly contribution to the study of war origins, offering essential insights into the psychological and social atmosphere of early 20th-century Europe. This book is an indispensable resource for students of history, political science, and the complex dynamics of international relations.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.