Shakespeare Canon Part IIq

In "The Shakespeare Canon Part II", J.M. Robertson continues his influential and controversial examination of the Shakespearean corpus, applying rigorous stylistic and linguistic analysis to determine the authenticity of the plays. As a leading figure in the school of "disintegration," Robertson investigates the potential contributions of Shakespeare's contemporaries-such as Greene, Peele, and Marlowe-to works traditionally attributed solely to the Bard.

This volume delves into specific plays, dissecting verse structures, vocabulary, and thematic elements to argue for a more collaborative view of Elizabethan dramatic production. Robertson's work is a landmark in the history of Shakespearean scholarship, representing a meticulous attempt to reconcile the variations in quality and style found within the First Folio. By challenging traditional notions of sole authorship, he provides a fascinating glimpse into the fluid nature of the early modern theater industry. This study remains essential for scholars of literary attribution, the history of criticism, and those interested in the complex evolution of the "Shakespeare" legacy. It offers a detailed look at the methodologies used by early 20th-century critics to navigate the mysteries of the Elizabethan stage.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.