Common Sense Versus Judicial Legislation: Being The Review Of A Law Recently Enacted By The Supreme

""Common Sense Versus Judicial Legislation: Being The Review Of A Law Recently Enacted By The Supreme Court Of Massachusetts"" is a book written by A Layman in 1874. The book is a critical examination of a law that was recently enacted by the Supreme Court of Massachusetts. The author argues that the law is an example of judicial legislation, which he defines as the creation of new laws by the courts rather than by the legislature. The author believes that this type of judicial activism is dangerous and undermines the democratic process. He argues that judges should interpret the law, not make it. The book is a call for a return to common sense and a respect for the separation of powers between the judiciary and the legislature. The author's arguments are presented in a clear and concise manner, making the book accessible to a wide audience. Overall, ""Common Sense Versus Judicial Legislation"" is a thought-provoking critique of judicial activism and its impact on the American legal system.Also Includes The Rule In Minot�������s Case Again, As Restated By The Supreme Judicial Court Of Massachusetts; And A Third Chapter On The Rule In Minot�������s Case.This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the old original and may contain some imperfections such as library marks and notations. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions, that are true to their original work.